It is really hard to miss the Supreme Court opposite treatment of two prestigious and famous matters.
The Ayodhya – Ram Janmabhoomi case needs a settlement – however the Supreme Court’s hearings and final judgment keeps getting delayed for decades.
On the other hand, on the Sabarimala issue, the court has ruled against the 1,000s year old traditions – probably a hurried judgment. And when the judgement was appealed on henalf of lakhs and crores of devotees and even when they sought an emergency hearing, the Supreme Court has refused to hear these?
Source: Business Standard
- 15 Nov 2018
The UP Shia board, who own the Shia waqf or property in a major development said that they were willing to relocate the masjid to a shia-muslim dominated area. The exact words that were spoken to the Supreme Court were, “WE WOULD SETTLE FOR A MASJID LOCATED IN A MUSLIM-DOMINATED AREA AT A REASONABLE DISTANCE FROM THE MOST REVERED PLACE OF BIRTH OF MARYADA PURUSHOTTAM SRI RAM“. This could be the key step to reach a happy settlement and prevent/limit the avoidance of future conflict.
Source: The Hindu
- 15 Aug 2017